Drawing for EYEMAX

USPTO serial 79026922

EYEMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3288389Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 4, 2007
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EYEMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lance J. Lieberman

LANCE J. LIEBERMAN Cozen O'Connor277 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10172UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Devices for technical endoscopy, in particular devices for technical video endoscopy; technical endoscopes, all not for medical purposes ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
010Endoscopes, in particular video endoscopes for medical purposes, medical apparatus and devices for endoscopySECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 9, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 11, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 22, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Dec 21, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Dec 6, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 6, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 4, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 3, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 20, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 8, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 27, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 27, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 27, 2013C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 27, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 13, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Jun 13, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jul 25, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 19, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 11, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 4, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 19, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 26, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 26, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 26, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 8, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 26, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 26, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance