USPTO serial 79027078
CROSSTRACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3734323Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 5, 2010
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CROSSTRACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GKN Driveline International GmbH
Lohmar, DE
GKN Driveline International GmbH
Lohmar, DE
GKN Driveline International GmbH
Lohmar, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATRIN LEWERTOFF
KATRIN LEWERTOFF MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 S. WACKER DRIVE, SEARS TOWERSUITE 6300CHICAGO, IL 60606-6357Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power transmission and gearing for machines other than turf mowers, and parts thereof; power transmission and gearing sold to manufacturers for incorporation into machines; machine parts for machines other than turf mowers, namely drive shafts, joints, gearings, couplings and clutches as well as parts thereof | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Power transmissions for land vehicles and parts thereof; power transmissions for land vehicles other than turf mowers; power transmissions for automobiles and parts thereof; power transmissions sold to manufacturers for incorporation into land vehicles; power transmissions sold to automobile manufacturers for use in building automobiles; land vehicle parts, namely drive shafts, joints, gearings, couplings and clutches and parts thereof; land vehicle parts for vehicles other than turf mowers, namely drive shafts, joints, gearings, couplings, and clutches, and parts thereof | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GKN Driveline International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by GKN Driveline International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by GKN Driveline International GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named CROSSTRACK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |