Drawing for ZIERSCH

USPTO serial 79027090

ZIERSCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3453905Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 24, 2008
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZIERSCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard P. Georget, Esq.

244 Fifth AvenueSuite 2325New York, NY 10001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for the metal industry and its parts as far as contained in this class, namely, machine tools, namely, milling machines, grinding machines, cutters being gear and milling cutters electric gas and laser welding machines, molding machines particularly for metal, engraving machines, planing machines, punching machines being punching presses, metalworking machines, die-stamping machines; accessories for the aforementioned machines, as far as contained in this class, namely, prototypes for stamped and molded parts, die-casting forms, molds and prototypes for processing of polymers; hand-held tools other than hand-operated, namely, angle grinder hand welding machine, belt grinder, hand-held gravure milling machine, portable drilling machineSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
040Metal treating, particularly milling being mill working, drilling, grinding, carbide metal working and deep hole drilling; providing information in the field of material treatment via the Internet; providing metal treating informationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Research and development services regarding mechanical construction planning in the field of machine and engine construction, technical consultancy in the field of machine and engine construction technology, conducting technical project studies; engineering; technical consultancy in the field of material treatment technologySECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Nov 20, 2022FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 15, 2022GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 17, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 21, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 11, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 11, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 8, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 21, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Oct 21, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Sep 30, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 30, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 29, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 24, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 24, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 28, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 14, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 14, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 7, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 4, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 8, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 15, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Jun 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 31, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 2, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 20, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance