USPTO serial 79027090
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard P. Georget, Esq.
244 Fifth AvenueSuite 2325New York, NY 10001| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for the metal industry and its parts as far as contained in this class, namely, machine tools, namely, milling machines, grinding machines, cutters being gear and milling cutters electric gas and laser welding machines, molding machines particularly for metal, engraving machines, planing machines, punching machines being punching presses, metalworking machines, die-stamping machines; accessories for the aforementioned machines, as far as contained in this class, namely, prototypes for stamped and molded parts, die-casting forms, molds and prototypes for processing of polymers; hand-held tools other than hand-operated, namely, angle grinder hand welding machine, belt grinder, hand-held gravure milling machine, portable drilling machine | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Metal treating, particularly milling being mill working, drilling, grinding, carbide metal working and deep hole drilling; providing information in the field of material treatment via the Internet; providing metal treating information | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Research and development services regarding mechanical construction planning in the field of machine and engine construction, technical consultancy in the field of machine and engine construction technology, conducting technical project studies; engineering; technical consultancy in the field of material treatment technology | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 20, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2022 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |