Drawing for CHIEN CHIC DE PARIS

USPTO serial 79027262

CHIEN CHIC DE PARIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3418486Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 29, 2008
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIEN CHIC DE PARIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald L. Dennison

DONALD L. DENNISON DENNISON, SCHULTZ & MACDONALD1727 KING STREET SUITE 105ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cleaning preparations for the hands, face and body and for pets; soaps; perfumes; essential cosmetic oils; hair lotions; dentifrices; leather preservatives, namely, polishes and creams for leather; personal deodorants; shaving balm, cream and gel, shaving preparations and shaving soaps; shampoos for pets; cosmetic preparations for baths, namely, bath beads, bath foam, bath gels, bath milks, bath oils, and bath salts; pre-moistened cosmetic tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 6, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 18, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Aug 27, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Aug 27, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Aug 5, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 5, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 13, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 13, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 21, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 21, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 5, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 5, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 4, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 18, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 18, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 29, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 10, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 22, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance