USPTO serial 79027485
ORLANDI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORLANDI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Adhesive bandages; adhesive bandages for skin wounds; adult diapers; surgical bandages; bandages for skin wounds; feminine hygiene pads; gauze; medical plasters; sanitary napkins; incontinence pads; sanitary pads; panty liners; panty shields; medical plasters; pre-moistened medicated towelettes; pre-moistened medicated wipes; medical adhesive tape | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | DISINFECTANT DISPENSERS FOR TOILETS; DISPOSABLE STERILIZATION POUCHES NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Brooms; feather brooms; hard brooms; rough brooms; shaving brush stands; material for brush-making; clothes brushes; crumb brushes; dishwashing brushes; dusting brushes; floor brushes; horse brushes; mushroom brushes; pot cleaning brushes; scraping brushes; scrubbing brushes; shoe brushes; toilet brushes; mane brushes; brushes for footwear; brushes for parquet floors; brushes for pets; brushes for use on bark of trees; brushes for vacuum cleaners; horse brushes of wire; wire brushes, not being machine parts; non electric carpet cleaners; non electric carpet sweepers; pot cleaning brushes; cleaning cloths; impregnated cleaning cloths; cleaning combs; cleaning cotton; cleaning mits of fabrics; cleaning pads; cleaning rags; cloth for wiping or dusting; clothes drying racks; clothing stretchers; cloths; impregnated cleaning, dusting or polishing cloths; washing cloths; glossing non abrasive cloths; window dusters; dusting gloves; glass fabrics for industrial use; glove stretchers; gardening gloves; plastic household gloves; polishing gloves; rubber household gloves; household gloves for general use; shaped ironing board covers; mops; impregnated papers tissues for cleaning dishware; impregnated cloths for polishing; polishing leather; pre-moistened towelettes for cleaning; scouring sponges; sponges for household purposes; non-woven fabric cosmetic not paper wipes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | Acrylic fibers; polyester batting; polyester fibers; synthetic fibers; textile fibers; polyester stuffing fibers; textile filaments; wadding not of rubber, paper or plastic for padding and stuffing | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 023 | Spun cotton; knitting yarn | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Fabric for boots and shoes; cloth napkins for removing makeup; textile used as lining for clothing; dish cloths; oil cloths; cotton fabric; mattress covers; unfitted fabric furniture covers; gauze fabric; linen lining fabric for shoes; handkerchiefs; textile napkins; polyester fabric; table cloths not of paper; towels; kitchen towels; tea towels; washcloths | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ORLANDI S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by ORLANDI S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 023
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named ORLANDI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |