USPTO serial 79027849
MINDRAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3382077Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 12, 2008
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MINDRAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SHENZHEN MINDRAY BIO-MEDICAL ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Nanshan, Shenzhen 518057, CN
Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN MINDRAY BIO-MEDICAL ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
SHENZHEN MINDRAY BIO-MEDICAL; ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Nanshan, Shenzhen 518057, CN
Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN MINDRAY BIO-MEDICAL; ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
SHENZHEN MINDRAY BIO-MEDICAL; ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Nanshan, Shenzhen 518057, CN
Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN MINDRAY BIO-MEDICAL; ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Mangelson
Michael E. Mangelson Stoel Rives LLP201 South MainSuite 1100Salt Lake City, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Pumps for medical purposes, namely, blood pumps, dialysis pumps; blood testing apparatus; injectors for medical purposes; medical apparatus and instruments, namely, apparatus for taking blood, apparatus for cardiac defibrillation; ventilators for medical purposes, x-ray apparatus for medical purposes, apparatus and installations for the production of x-rays for medical purposes and protection devices against x-rays for medical purposes; sphygmomanometers; resuscitation apparatus; apparatus for use in medical analysis, namely, apparatus for blood analysis; diagnostic apparatus for use in urine analysis, bacteria analysis, chemical analysis, biological analysis, and enzyme analysis; testing apparatus for medical purposes, namely, skin allergy testing apparatus, blood glucose testing apparatus, blood testing apparatus; medical diagnostic apparatus for medical purposes, namely, ultrasonic and magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic apparatus, x-ray computer tomography, CT, and diagnostic x-ray apparatus; electrodes for medical use; apparatus for use in administering anesthetic; thermometers for medical purposes; heart pacemakers; defibrillators; electrocardiographs; supersonic instruments and parts for medical purposes, namely, medical ultrasound diagnostic imaging apparatuses and component parts therefor | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN MINDRAY BIO-MEDICAL ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN MINDRAY BIO-MEDICAL; ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN MINDRAY BIO-MEDICAL; ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named MINDRAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |