Drawing for NAUTILUS

USPTO serial 79028520

NAUTILUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3356564Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 18, 2007
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAUTILUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David S. Jacobson

David S. Jacobson Gordon & Jacobson, P.C.60 Long Ridge Road, Suite 407Stamford, CT 06902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Milk cooling installations and milk cooling tanksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 24, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 3, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 27, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 27, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 12, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 7, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 28, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 30, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 30, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance