USPTO serial 79028838
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
FR
F-42400 SAINT-CHAMOND, FR
F-42400 SAINT-CHAMOND, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ruy Garcia-Zamor
TECHNOMARK42400Parc d'activités STELYTECSAINT CHAMOND,| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, electrical apparatus and instruments for the indelible marking of industrial parts and tools, namely, marking apparatus using laser-driven micro-impact technology, calibrating equipment for testing; computer software for programming, directing and using the graining and marking machines and the graining and marking equipments; computer software for managing database related to marking operations; computer software for transferring marking data; computer software for creating logos | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |