USPTO serial 79029847
TECHNOMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3402016Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2008
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHNOMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machine tools, namely, broaches, chasers, gear cutters, machine tool holders, milling cutters, metalworking machine tools, marking machines tools, engraving machines, cutting machines for metalworking, drilling machines for metalworking, grinding machines for metalworking, metal sawing machines, electromagnetic dot peen marking and punching presses; motors and engines not for land vehicles; couplings and transmission components in the nature of seals, bearings for transmission shafts, and belts, for engraving machines and machines for marking industrial parts; marking machines, namely, plasma etching machines, engraving machines, laser engraving machines, dot marking machines, micro-impact marking machines, electro-magnetic marking machines and micro-percussion marking machines; transmission components, namely, transmission belts, transmission gears for machines, bearings for transmission shafts, being parts of machines, automotive parts, namely, transmission seals | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |