USPTO serial 79030086
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vaduz, LI
Vaduz, LI
LI
Chiswick, London, GB
Chiswick, London, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Bruce Prout
David A. Plumley CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPP.O. Box 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | photographic apparatus and instruments, namely, cameras, cases for cameras, disposable cameras, digital cameras; optical apparatus and instruments, namely, sunglasses, sunglass lenses, frames for sunglasses, cases for sunglasses, chains for sunglasses, spectacles, spectacle frames, cases for spectacles, lenses for spectacles; chains for spectacles, binoculars; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; blank magnetic data carriers, blank recording discs; data processors and computers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | jewelry, precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | [ Beers; non-alcoholic beers; low alcoholic beers ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | [ alcoholic beverages, namely, distilled spirits, distilled liquor, wine, rum, gin, vodka, whisky, alcoholic bitters, brandy, hard cider, alcoholic aperitif bitters, aperitif wines, aperitifs with a distilled alcoholic liquor base, aperitifs with a wine base, sake and prepared alcoholic cocktails ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 13, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |