USPTO serial 79030529
CTB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3663759Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 4, 2009
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CTB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS USED IN INDUSTRY, SCIENCE AND PHOTOGRAPHY, AS WELL AS IN AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE AND FORESTRY, NAMELY, CHEMICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF SEEDS; UNPROCESSED ARTIFICIAL RESINS FOR USE IN AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT, RAILWAY, PACKAGING, MACHINE-BUILDING, MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND SPORTS GOODS-INDUSTRY; UNPROCESSED PLASTICS FOR CHEMICALS USED IN INDUSTRY, SCIENCE AND PHOTOGRAPHY, AS WELL AS IN AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE AND FORESTRY, NAMELY, CHEMICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF SEEDS; UNPROCESSED PLASTICS FOR USE IN AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT, RAILWAY, PACKAGING, MACHINE-BUILDING, MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND SPORTS GOODS INDUSTRY; MANURES; FIRE EXTINGUISHING COMPOSITIONS; CHEMICAL TEMPERING AND SOLDERING PREPARATIONS; ADHESIVES FOR GENERAL INDUSTRIAL USE | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | CAOUTCHOUC, GUTTA-PERCHA, RUBBER, MICA FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF AUTOMOBILES, AIRCRAFTS, RAILWAYS; PLASTICS IN EXTRUDED FORM FOR USE IN MANUFACTURE; PACKING, STOPPING AND INSULATING MATERIALS, NAMELY, PACKING MATERIAL FOR FORMING SEALS, PLASTIC PACKING FOR SHIPPING CONTAINERS, INSULATING FOR AIRCRAFT, INSULATION COVERS FOR INDUSTRIAL MACHINERYFOR USE IN AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT, RAILWAY, PACKAGING, MACHINE-BUILDING, MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND SPORTS GOODS INDUSTRY; FLEXIBLE PIPES, NOT OF METAL | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | NON-METALLIC RIGID PIPES FOR BUILDING; ASPHALT AND PITCH; NON-METALLIC TRANSPORTABLE BUILDINGS; MONUMENTS MADE OF UNPROCESSED AND PROCESSED PLASTICS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HBW-Gubesch Thermoforming GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Jacob Composite GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Jacob Composite GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Jacob Composite GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named CTB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |