USPTO serial 79030920
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Thurnau
Jeffrey A. Thurnau The Gates Corporation1551 Wewatta St.DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ Metal hose clamps for flexible hoses; metal tubes including hydraulic tubes, fuel tubes, braided and rigid tubes; metal tubes for turbochargers; metal tubes for cooling radiators for motors and engines, including those of land vehicles; metal tubes for brake linings for vehicles ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Power transmission belts for land vehicle engines including variable speed belts; power transmission belts for machines, motors and engines used in industrial applications including variable speed belts; timing belts for engines for land vehicles; timing belts for machines, motors and engines used in industrial applications; vacuum cleaner hoses; sprockets and pulleys, variable diameter pulleys, adjustable pulleys, dual pulley tensioning systems comprising belts and pulleys, belt tensioners, lockable tensioning devices in the nature of lockable tensioners and tensioning idler pulleys, all being parts of engines, machines or motors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Drive belts and power transmission belts for land vehicles including variable speed belts; [ land vehicle power transmission and structural parts for land vehicles other than belts for land vehicles, namely, tensioners, sprockets and pulleys ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Flexible tubes of rubber for land vehicles, including hydraulic hose, fuel hose, braided hose and rigid tubing; hose assemblies made of rubber for land vehicles; non-metallic hose clamping sleeves; non-metallic turbocharger hose; non-metallic hose for cooling radiators for motors and engines, including those of land vehicles; hydraulic hose assemblies made of rubber; non-metallic tubes for brake linings for vehicles; non-metallic hose clamps | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2017 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |