Drawing for RACING

USPTO serial 79030921

RACING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3508785Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 30, 2008
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RACING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey A. Thurnau

Jeffrey A. Thurnau The Gates Corporation1551 Wewatta StreetDenver, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007power transmission belts for machines, motors and engines used in industrial applications including variable speed belts; timing belts for machines, motors and engines used in industrial applications; vacuum cleaner hosesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 20, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 24, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 18, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 26, 2018CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jan 22, 2018CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 15, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 15, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 30, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 18, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 18, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 18, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 1, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 20, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 15, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 25, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 21, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 16, 2007CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 12, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Dec 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance