USPTO serial 79031691
MPOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3598573Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 31, 2009
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MPOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Stachniak
Jennifer Stachniak Johnson, Marcou & Isaacs, LLC317A East Liberty StreetSavannah, GA 31401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing telecommunication connections to printer stations and data transfer from work stations, servers and mobile work stations to printer stations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Installation, maintenance and updating and enhancements and further development of printer software; consultation in the selection, implementation and use of software and software for use with computer hardware, * exclusively in connection with mobile printing *; consultancy in the field of software, * exclusively in connection with mobile printing *; consultancy in the field of printer software, technological consultation in the field of telecommunication technology, * exclusively in connection with mobile printing *; design and development of printer software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |