Drawing for TF TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79031764

TF TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3546993Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 16, 2008
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TF TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark B Harrison

MARK B HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Printing machines; print heads for printing machines; printing ink supply systems for use with printers composed primarily of ink reservoirs, ink pumps and ink connectors; machines for paper cutting and paper feeding; Storage containers for ink and colored printing ink for use in printing machines sold empty; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
009Computer-controlled printers; ink-jet printers; component parts for printers, namely, print heads, ink supply components for use with printers, namely, ink controller unit for ink temperature and flow rate regulation, ink conditioning module for filtering and heating ink, and a pressure module for providing inputs to the ink controller unit; connection cables; computer interface components for printers; electric changeover switches for printers; computer software for use in printing or in connection with printersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 23, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 27, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 9, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 15, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 22, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 27, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Apr 27, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Mar 17, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 17, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 19, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 27, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 16, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 16, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 30, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 31, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 15, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 15, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 16, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 16, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jan 9, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance