CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LAND

USPTO serial 79032162

LAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3356643Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 18, 2007
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LU TING

CONVENTION PLAZA3011, 30/F, OFFICE TOWER1 HARBOUR ROAD,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Washing apparatus, namely, clothes washing machines, electric washing machines for industrial purposes, floor washing machines; vehicle washing installations; vacuum cleaners; multi-purpose high pressure washers; snow ploughs; electric hammers; washing machines, namely, clothes washing machines, dish washing machines, pressure washing machines; dishwashers; household soybean milking machineSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 2, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 22, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 18, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 24, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 13, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 6, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance