Drawing for POSIJET

USPTO serial 79032776

POSIJET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3369651Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 15, 2008
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with POSIJET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NEIL F. GREENBLUM

NEIL F. GREENBLUM GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN, P.L.C.1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLACERESTON, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Machines for protection against ionizing radiation not for medical use and replacement parts therefor, monitoring machines for analyzing and measuring radioactive products and radiation not for medical use and replacement parts therefor, machines for sampling, calibrating and injecting radioactive solutions not for medical use and replacement parts thereforACTIVE
010Machines for protection against ionizing radiation for medical use and replacement parts therefor, monitoring machines for analyzing and measuring radioactive products and radiation for medical use and replacement parts therefor, machines for sampling, calibrating and injecting radioactive solutions for medical use and replacement parts thereforACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 14, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 26, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Dec 26, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Dec 18, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 15, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 15, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 3, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 25, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 25, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 25, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 6, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Dec 16, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Dec 14, 2013RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED
May 8, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 16, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 20, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 20, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 20, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 16, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 28, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance