USPTO serial 79033451
GATEMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3468046Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 15, 2008
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GATEMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greger
JEFFREY H. GREGER LOWE HAUPTMAN HAM & BERNER, LLP2318 MILL ROADSUITE 1400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronically controlled automatic door opening and closing apparatus, namely, automatic controllers for revolving doors, electric door closing systems, electric door openers, electronic door openers; electronically controlled apparatus for information communication, namely, apparatus for transmission of communication, communication servers; [semiconductor chips with built-in password facility; ] electric door closing apparatus; electric door opening apparatus, namely, electric door opener; electromechanical automatic door opening and closing apparatus, namely, electronic door closing systems; electric locks; anti-theft warning apparatus, namely, theft alarms, burglar alarms; heat sensors; fire alarms; electric door bells; [ video telephones; ] electronic theft prevention apparatus, namely, theft alarms, burglar alarms; magnetically encoded key cards; [ magnetically encoded credit cards; surveillance cameras; thermostats; gas leak alarms, namely, gas detectors for detecting the presence of gas; sound alarms, namely, electric alarm warning bells; Internet phones; automatic answering machines; portable communications apparatus, namely, portable telephones; apparatus for sending messages, namely, portable telecommunication instant messaging devices; modems; home automation communications servers; home automation communications system servers; electric monitoring apparatus, namely, alarm monitoring systems; universal remote controls for radios, televisions, stereos; PDAs (personal digital assistants); sensors other than for medical use, namely, weather sensors for opening and closing windows; closed-circuit televisions, closed-circuit television systems comprised of closed-circuit televisions and closed-circuit television cameras for surveillance purposes; video recorders; hard disk video recorders, namely, digital video recorders; digital audio tape recorders; home network intercommunication apparatus, namely, apparatus for remote access of home network systems; ] electric anti-theft apparatus, namely, theft alarms, burglar alarms; [ smoke detectors; ] fingerprint identification systems, namely, video and audio monitors and devices for fingerprint imaging, namely, fingerprint readers and scanners; [ time-lapse video recorders; charge-coupled device cameras; hard discs for computers recorded with sound files; hard discs for computers recorded with data; recorded compact discs featuring information about security systems and door systems; recorded video discs featuring information about security systems and door systems; recorded video tapes featuring information about security systems and door systems; hard computer discs for storing video files; sound recording discs featuring information about security systems and door systems; apparatus for recording and playing sound; automatic control systems for home use, namely, surveillance and security system comprising video and audio monitors; ] automatic electronic security systems, surveillance and security system comprising video and audio monitors, fingerprint imaging, reading, and scanning devices, door and entryway video all for purposes of one-way and two-way surveillance and communications [ ; video door phone systems comprised of audio and video monitors; remote control apparatus for telemeters; apparatus and instruments for voice frequency transmission; automatic turnstiles; telephones; photo telegraphy apparatus; sound recorders; sound reproduction apparatus ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2021 | IRIV | IRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |