USPTO serial 79034984
FORTEQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORTEQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools for cutting and forming materials; electrical motors for opening and closing of doors and windows; machine couplings, except for land vehicles; gears and gear boxes for industrial machinery | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | Automatic vending machines; cash registers, calculating machines; data processors, printers and computers; apparatus and instruments for use in car bodies, namely, electric opening and closing systems for windows and doors; steering parts and housings for air ventilation | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Medical apparatus and instruments, namely, inhalers with dosing function | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | Rubber, gutta percha, gum and plastics for the use in the manufacture of gear wheels, gear boxes, steering parts and housings for ventilation | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Design services and technical support in the product development of gear wheels, combinations of gear wheels and transmission systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Transmission Technology Holding AG
- Other trademarks owned by Forteq Nidau AG
- Other trademarks owned by SIR Communicatiemanagement B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by SIR Communicatiemanagement B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FORTEQ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 8, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |