USPTO serial 79035809
OYSHO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3583477Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 3, 2009
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with OYSHO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A.; (INDITEX, S.A.)
ARTEIXO (A CORUÑA), ES
Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A.; (INDITEX, S.A.)
INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A.; (INDITEX, S.A.)
E-15142 ARTEIXO (A CORUÑA), ES
Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A.; (INDITEX, S.A.)
INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A.; (INDITEX, S.A.)
E-15142 ARTEIXO (A CORUÑA), ES
Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A.; (INDITEX, S.A.)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ricardo Fischer
Ricardo Fischer ArentFox Schiff LLP1717 K Street, NWWashington, DC 20006United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Hair accessories, namely, elastic and rigid hair bands, hair grips, barrettes, hair ornaments not made of precious metal, and hair pins [ ; shoe ornaments not made of precious metal; hat ornaments not made of precious metal; clothing accessories, namely, feathers for ornamentation, sequins, belt buckles not of precious metal, ornamental novelty badges; shoulder pads for clothing; shoe laces; buttons for clothing; brooches not made of precious metal and not imitation jewelry; and artificial flowers ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A.; (INDITEX, S.A.)
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A.; (INDITEX, S.A.)
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A.; (INDITEX, S.A.)
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named OYSHO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 26, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |