USPTO serial 79036089
CSD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3818407Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 13, 2010
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CSD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Karl Heesemann; Maschinenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
32547 Bad Oeynhausen, DE
Other trademarks owned by Karl Heesemann; Maschinenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
Karl Heesemann; Maschinenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
32547 Bad Oeynhausen, DE
Other trademarks owned by Karl Heesemann; Maschinenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
Karl Heesemann Maschinenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
Bad Oeynhausen, DE
Other trademarks owned by Karl Heesemann Maschinenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert N. Cook
Robert N. Cook Whitham & Cook, P.C. | W&C IP11491 Sunset Hills Road, Suite 340Reston, VA 20190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Wood and metal machinery, namely, machines for wood, lacquer, foils and metal sanding, namely, cross sanding machines, longitudinal sanding machines, lacquer and smoothing machines, belt sanding machines, sanding machines for shaped surfaces, veneer sheet sanders, universal edge sanding machines, profile sanding machines, and buffing machines for surfaces and profiles, not for use in down hole drilling applications; parts for sanding machines, namely, longitudinal and transversal sanding units, not for use in down hole drilling applications; electronically controlled pressure beams, namely, a range comprising multiple machine tools for applying pressure arranged transversely to the transportation direction of a workpiece, not for use in down hole drilling applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electrical controlling devices; automatic switch boards; switch boxes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Karl Heesemann; Maschinenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Karl Heesemann; Maschinenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Karl Heesemann Maschinenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CSD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 30, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 1, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |