CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CSD

USPTO serial 79036089

CSD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3818407Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 13, 2010
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CSD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert N. Cook

Robert N. Cook Whitham & Cook, P.C. | W&C IP11491 Sunset Hills Road, Suite 340Reston, VA 20190UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Wood and metal machinery, namely, machines for wood, lacquer, foils and metal sanding, namely, cross sanding machines, longitudinal sanding machines, lacquer and smoothing machines, belt sanding machines, sanding machines for shaped surfaces, veneer sheet sanders, universal edge sanding machines, profile sanding machines, and buffing machines for surfaces and profiles, not for use in down hole drilling applications; parts for sanding machines, namely, longitudinal and transversal sanding units, not for use in down hole drilling applications; electronically controlled pressure beams, namely, a range comprising multiple machine tools for applying pressure arranged transversely to the transportation direction of a workpiece, not for use in down hole drilling applicationsACTIVE—
009Electrical controlling devices; automatic switch boards; switch boxesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 2, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 16, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 31, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 31, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 30, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 12, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 17, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 1, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 13, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 27, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 21, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 6, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 29, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 9, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 17, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 1, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance