USPTO serial 79036224
CRYTUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3679859Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 8, 2009
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRYTUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Inorganic chemical products, namely, inorganic chemical preparations for use in the manufacture of monocrystals and semiconductors | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Semiconductors of all types and monocrystalline semiconductor material and products thereof, namely, processed, un-processed or powdered single crystals semiconductor material for applications in lasers primarily laser rods, radiation detection primarily imaging screens, detectors for microscopy and tomography, including housing, or other scintillation detectors for scientific or industrial applications, and measurement technology | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CRYTUR, spol.s r.o.
- Other trademarks owned by CRYTUR, spol.s r.o.
- Other trademarks owned by CRYTUR, spol.s r.o.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CRYTUR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 19, 2018 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2009 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |