Drawing for COMFORT ON DEMAND

USPTO serial 79038031

COMFORT ON DEMAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3458258Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 1, 2008
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMFORT ON DEMAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sylvia A. Petrosky

Sylvia A. Petrosky Sylvia A. Petrosky, Esq.2273 Smith RoadAkron, OH 44333UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture and chairs; armchairs, divans, sofas, beds, stools, poufs, cushions and lounge chairsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 30, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 8, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 6, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 6, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 1, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 26, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 30, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Jun 23, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance