USPTO serial 79039044
FROM LAB TO FAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FROM LAB TO FAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
65203 Wiesbaden, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meyer A. Gross
MEYER A. GROSSS SCHWEITZER COMMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products for use in industry and science, namely, substrates and coating compounds used in chemical process technology and biological process technology | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and veterinary products, namely, substrates for use with cells and tissues and implant materials comprising living tissue, enzymes, antibodies, growth factors or pharmaceutical agents, namely agents for applications in connection with medical purposes; grafts, namely, vessels, tissues and organs, and stents of all types comprising living tissue, enzymes, antibodies, growth factors or pharmaceutical agents, namely agents for applications in connection with medical purposes; chemical products for use in industry and science, namely substrates and coating compounds used in medical technology | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, catheter, intracardiac catheter; medical, surgical and orthopaedic implants made of artificial materials, endoprosthesis, stents of all types, in particular for support or extension of blood vessels; biocompatibly coated stents, stents releasing pharmaceutical agents; implantable depots for pharmaceutical agents; bone or joint prosthesis; artificial hearts and parts thereof, artificial cardiac valves; cardiac pacemaker; substrates for cells and tissues as part of artificial bone or joint prosthesis; artificial limbs, eyes and teeth; orthopaedic articles, namely, orthopaedic devices used in orthopaedic transplant and implant surgery; suture material | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific research and technological services and design for others in the field of biological process technology in connection with the development of materials, coatings, coating technologies and marking technologies for medical, surgical and orthopaedic implants for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes, stents eluting pharmaceutical agents, stents containing markers, implantable active agent depots; development of substrates for cells or living tissue in biological process technology; development of substrate systems, membrane and separating technology for chemical process technology | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 11, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |