USPTO serial 79039265
CHILLOUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHILLOUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta S. Bren
Roberta S. Bren Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C.1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatus and instruments, namely apparatus designed to receive, process and store audio and visual data; apparatus for reproducing, sound, radio and television apparatuses, recorders based on tape, wire, and disk recording technologies, VHS videotape recorders and DVD recorders; television sets, video-projectors, satellite receivers, record player, high fidelity stereo system comprised primarily of interfaces with transmission system, decoding, storage and presentation, amplifiers, loudspeakers, sounds or images transmitting, receiving, reproducing, registering apparatuses, namely CD and DVD audio and video reproducers, electronic computer, computer hardware; computer software for producing audio and visual content for distribution, receiving, decoding and presenting audio and visual content; computer memories; computer interfaces, namely with network and storage; computer peripheral devices; computer and electronic game programs recorded on magnetic discs and tapes; data recorded in computer accessible form, namely digitised audio and visual information; magnetic data media, namely tape and disk prerecorded with digital audio and visual information; namely prerecorded magnetic disks for distribution to users; namely prerecorded magnetic data carrier disks for distribution to users; microprocessors; microprocessor systems namely keyboards; monitors suitable to display still and moving pictures; personal computer add-ons, namely smart cards and external storage systems; disk drivers, namely for magnetic disks and tapes; stands designed specifically for computers; telephones, microphones; prerecorded digital versatile disc for movies and videos; sound cards; graphics accelerator boards; digital video camcorders; digital cameras; CD-ROM players; integrated circuits; apparatus and instruments for use in connection with computer software, namely video and audio processing; magnetic cards; remote controls; programmed-data-carrying electronic circuits; multimedia software products, namely audio, video and games; digital audio players; digital signal processors; MP3 players; personal computer web camera | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Terrestrial, satellite and cable broadcasting; cellular telephone communication; communication by computer terminals; one-way and two-way transmission of information accessible through access code to a central server or a web site; communication by computer telephone; computer aided transmission of messages and images; electronic mail services; radio broadcasting; telecommunications, namely one-way and two-way telephone services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto, namely audio and visual processing; industrial analysis and research services in the field of namely audio and visual processing; design and development of computer hardware and software; data; sound and image processing, namely compression distribution and decompression; services in the field of information technology, namely distribution of audio and visual information | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CEDEO S.a.s.
- Other trademarks owned by DIGITAL MEDIA PROJECT C/O JACQUEMMOUD ET STANISLAS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CHILLOUT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |