USPTO serial 79039283
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
FEG Textiltechnik Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
Aachen, DE
Other trademarks owned by FEG Textiltechnik Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
FEG Textiltechnik Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by FEG Textiltechnik Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
FEG Textiltechnik Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by FEG Textiltechnik Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day35 West 35th StreetSuite 900New York, NY 10001| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | [ SURGICAL THREADS; ] SURGICAL IMPLANTS MADE OF PLASTIC, MORE SPECIFICALLY WITH NET-SHAPED SURFACE AND BODY STRUCTURES; [ SURGICAL SUTURE MATERIAL; SURGICAL SUTURE NEEDLES AND THREADS; PROBES FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; ELASTIC BANDAGES; SURGICAL IMPLANTS MADE OF ARTIFICIAL MATERIALS; ICE BAGS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; BELTS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; X-RAY PHOTOGRAPHS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; SCISSORS FOR SURGICAL PURPOSES, NAMELY, SURGICAL SCISSORS; ULTRAVIOLET LAMPS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; ELECTRICALLY ACTIVATED HOT COMPRESSES FOR SURGICAL PURPOSES; WOUND CLAMPS, NAMELY, WOUND CLAMPS IN THE NATURE OF TOURNIQUETS FOR STOPPING BLEEDING BY FORCIBLY COMPRESSING BLOOD VESSELS, FOR MEDICAL USE; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS, EYES AND TEETH; ORTHOPEDIC ARTICLES, NAMELY, ORTHOPEDIC BRACES AND BELTS; ELASTIC THREADS FOR MEDICAL AND SURGICAL PURPOSES; ] PLASTIC FIBERS FOR MEDICAL AND SURGICAL PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 2, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |