Drawing for BLUECAR

USPTO serial 79039545

BLUECAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3853659Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 28, 2010
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUECAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle L. Zimmermann

Michelle L. Zimmermann Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd.Two Prudential Plaza, 180 N. Stetson AveSuite 4900Chicago, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Electrically powered cleaning machines in the nature of cleaning carts being electric machines, namely, road sweepers and vacuum cleaners, wax polishing machines for household and industrial purposes, indoor steam cleaning machines and their parts, namely, electric-motors and transmission assemblies; electrically powered construction machines, namely, automatic street sweeping machines, lifting and hoisting apparatus, auto-hoists, lawnmowers, rotary tillers; electro-motors and transmission assemblies for boats; cleaning carts being electric machines, namely, road sweepers and vacuum cleaners, wax polishing appliances for household and industrial purposes, indoor steam cleaning machines ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009[ Batteries, battery chargers, capacitors and super capacitors; electronic control panels and device for controlling electric vehicles such as electrically powered land vehicles, electrically powered cycles, namely, motorcycles and bicycles, electrically powered scooters, electrically powered construction machines, electrically powered cleaning vehicles and electrically powered boats ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012Vehicles and apparatus for locomotion by land, air and water, namely, electrically powered land vehicles [, electrically powered cycles, namely, motorcycles and bicycles, electrically powered scooters, electrically powered construction vehicles in the nature of concrete mixing vehicles, industrial trucks, electrically powered trolleys for conveying cleaning equipment, fork-lift trucks and vans, and electrically powered boats; electro- motors and transmission assemblies designed for electrically powered vehicles, namely, electrically powered land vehicles, electrically powered cycles, namely, motorcycles and bicycles, electrically powered scooters, electrically powered construction vehicles in the nature of concrete mixing vehicles, industrial trucks, electrically powered trolleys for conveying cleaning equipment, fork-lift trucks and vans, and electrically powered boats ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 21, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 9, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 9, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 5, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 22, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 15, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 15, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 201771.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 15, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 28, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 28, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 13, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 10, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 25, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 20, 2010EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
Jan 25, 2010GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2010GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 5, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 5, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 16, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 9, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 25, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 8, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 7, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 26, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance