USPTO serial 79040092
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie E. Sternberg
Jamie E. Sternberg Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church StreetFloor 22Hartford, CT 06103| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance brokerage services featuring intermediary services in connection with insurance of other companies' goods while in storage and in connection with transport; insurance consultancy; information and consultancy regarding insurance conditions, delivered online via a computer database or the Internet; customs brokerage; consultancy regarding customs brokerage | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Transport services, excluding passenger transport, as well as services in connection with packaging and storage of goods, namely, shipping business in the nature of pickup, transportation and delivery of freight by various modes of transportation; logistics services in the nature of supply chain, logistics and reverse logistics services, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of freight for others by air, rail, ship or truck, and freight forwarding services; transport by land, water and air, transport of miscellaneous cargo, transport of textiles, dump car and container transport, powder transport, transport of dangerous cargo, refrigerated transport; rental of warehouses and store rooms, rental of cold-storage rooms, packaging of goods for transportation; cargo handling services featuring measuring, calculating, quantity control and quality control of cargo and freight in connection with transport and storage of goods; providing information regarding transport and storage of goods; ship brokerage services, providing information regarding transport online via a computer database or via the Internet, including track and trace services for freight allowing transport customers possibility to track and follow own consignments; running of freight terminals, namely, receiving, storing and forwarding of freight; providing consultancy and information about harbour conditions, namely, with regard to harbour navigation conditions and harbour facilities; providing consultancy and information about transport and storage of goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 24, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |