Drawing for EOLE

USPTO serial 79040644

EOLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3496158Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 2, 2008
Examiner
KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with EOLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles T.J. Weigell

Charles T.J. Weigell Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Luggage, [ rucksacks, ] traveling bags, [ school bags, trunks, beach bags, ] wheeled traveling bags, [ haversacks, ] garment bags for travel, [ leather cases for travel, ] suitcases [, handbags ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 18, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
May 19, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 19, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 19, 2020ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
May 19, 2020EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
May 19, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 19, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 14, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 3, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 31, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 3, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 1, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 13, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 18, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 15, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 17, 2015NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 17, 201515AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Mar 31, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 31, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 31, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 14, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2014E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 2, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 17, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 9, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 18, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 7, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 21, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance