Drawing for ARIX AUTO-ARRAY SYSTEM

USPTO serial 79040660

ARIX AUTO-ARRAY SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3462605Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 8, 2008
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARIX AUTO-ARRAY SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EVERETT E. FRUEHLING

EVERETT E. FRUEHLING CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PLLC1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101-3029UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power tools, namely, grinders, power drills, power drill bits, milling cutters, wheel cutters, power-operated cup-type wheels, tool bits for machines, pads for floor polishing machines, power saw blades, core drills, power-operated grinding wheels, namely, scriber wheels, wafer back grinding electric wheels, wafer edge grinding electric wheels, glass edge grinding electric wheels, electric diamond wheels, pad conditioning electric diamond power tools for chemical and mechanical polishing, power-operated router bit electric wheels, power-operated wire saw for cutting stones and concrete, power-operated rotary grinding wheelsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 14, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 24, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 24, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 13, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 13, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 18, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 29, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 31, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 28, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 28, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 9, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 27, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 27, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 27, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 27, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 25, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Aug 16, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance