USPTO serial 79040660
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EVERETT E. FRUEHLING
EVERETT E. FRUEHLING CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PLLC1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101-3029UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power tools, namely, grinders, power drills, power drill bits, milling cutters, wheel cutters, power-operated cup-type wheels, tool bits for machines, pads for floor polishing machines, power saw blades, core drills, power-operated grinding wheels, namely, scriber wheels, wafer back grinding electric wheels, wafer edge grinding electric wheels, glass edge grinding electric wheels, electric diamond wheels, pad conditioning electric diamond power tools for chemical and mechanical polishing, power-operated router bit electric wheels, power-operated wire saw for cutting stones and concrete, power-operated rotary grinding wheels | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 25, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |