USPTO serial 79041890
PANCHO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3692645Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 6, 2009
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PANCHO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PANCO GIYIM SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by PANCO GIYIM SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
PANCO KOLLEKTIF SIRKETI; SADI LEVI VE ORTAKLARI
TR
Other trademarks owned by PANCO KOLLEKTIF SIRKETI; SADI LEVI VE ORTAKLARI
PANCO KOLLEKTIF SIRKETI; SADI LEVI VE ORTAKLARI
TR
Other trademarks owned by PANCO KOLLEKTIF SIRKETI; SADI LEVI VE ORTAKLARI
PANCO KOLLEKTIF SIRKETI; SADI LEVI VE ORTAKLARI
TR
Other trademarks owned by PANCO KOLLEKTIF SIRKETI; SADI LEVI VE ORTAKLARI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Baby and children clothing, namely, cloth bibs, hats, tops, t-shirts, pants, shoes, underwear, dresses, shirts, blouses, socks, bathing suits, sleepwear, jumpers, swimwear and jackets, coats, and sweaters, and shoes and footwear | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Online retail store services, mail order catalog services, and retail stores featuring baby and children clothing, shoes, toys, dolls, games, bedding and room decor, furniture, diaper and hand bags, strollers and baby accessories, books, pre-recorded music and video media, health and beauty products, baby announcements | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PANCO GIYIM SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by PANCO KOLLEKTIF SIRKETI; SADI LEVI VE ORTAKLARI
- Other trademarks owned by PANCO KOLLEKTIF SIRKETI; SADI LEVI VE ORTAKLARI
- Other trademarks owned by PANCO KOLLEKTIF SIRKETI; SADI LEVI VE ORTAKLARI
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named PANCHO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 16, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |