USPTO serial 79041936
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
65203 Wiesbaden, DE
65203 Wiesbaden, DE
65203 Wiesbaden, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MEYER A. GROSS
Michael A. Cornman Ladas & Parry LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018-3738UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and veterinary products, namely, skin, arterial and vascular grafts comprising living tissue, enzymes, antibodies, growth factors and pharmaceutical agents, namely, agents for diagnostic applications or therapeutic treatment and none of the foregoing including building-up products or tonics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, catheter, intracardiac catheter; medical, surgical and orthopaedic implants made from artificial materials; vascular endoprosthesis, stents of all types made from artificial materials, in particular for support or extension of blood vessels and biocompatibly coated stents made from artificial materials; stents eluting pharmaceutical agents made from artificial materials, stents containing markers made from artificial materials; synthetic stent grafts and artificial vascular grafts made from artificial materials featuring enzymes, antibodies and growth factors; artificial limbs, eyes and teeth; orthopaedic articles, namely, orthopaedic fixation devices for use in orthopaedic surgery; suture material | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific research and technological services in the nature of product development, and design for others, all in the field of biological process technology, namely, for the development of materials, coatings, coating technologies and marking technologies for biocompatibly coated stents, stents eluting pharmaceutical agents, and stents containing markers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |