Drawing for CINTELLIGENT

USPTO serial 79041936

CINTELLIGENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3676546Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 1, 2009
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CINTELLIGENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MEYER A. GROSS

Michael A. Cornman Ladas & Parry LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018-3738UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical and veterinary products, namely, skin, arterial and vascular grafts comprising living tissue, enzymes, antibodies, growth factors and pharmaceutical agents, namely, agents for diagnostic applications or therapeutic treatment and none of the foregoing including building-up products or tonicsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
010Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, catheter, intracardiac catheter; medical, surgical and orthopaedic implants made from artificial materials; vascular endoprosthesis, stents of all types made from artificial materials, in particular for support or extension of blood vessels and biocompatibly coated stents made from artificial materials; stents eluting pharmaceutical agents made from artificial materials, stents containing markers made from artificial materials; synthetic stent grafts and artificial vascular grafts made from artificial materials featuring enzymes, antibodies and growth factors; artificial limbs, eyes and teeth; orthopaedic articles, namely, orthopaedic fixation devices for use in orthopaedic surgery; suture materialSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific research and technological services in the nature of product development, and design for others, all in the field of biological process technology, namely, for the development of materials, coatings, coating technologies and marking technologies for biocompatibly coated stents, stents eluting pharmaceutical agents, and stents containing markersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 28, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 11, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 8, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 8, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 1, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 16, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 8, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 4, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2008ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 11, 2008CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Aug 14, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 3, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 27, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance