Drawing for TAIFU

USPTO serial 79042853

TAIFU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAIFU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Pumps; motors; fansSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 30, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 2, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 4, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 2, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 20, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 5, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 5, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 2, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 2, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 11, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 11, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 11, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 28, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 27, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance