USPTO serial 79043076
AUDIFON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUDIFON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philana S. Handler
Philana S. Handler Witham,Curtis,Christofferson & Cook,P.C.11491 Sunset Hills Rd.Suite 340RESTON, VA 20190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Acoustic apparatus and instruments, included in this class; Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound; electric accumulators and chargers for accumulators; acoustic couplers; batteries; cases adapted for acoustic instruments for the hearing impaired, with the exception of hifi-products for vehicles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Medical instruments for the treatment of Tinnitus; hearing aids and their structural parts; hearing aids for incorporation into spectacles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Repair and maintenance of medical and otological apparatus and instruments, in particular of hearing aids | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Services of a hearing-aid acoustician, namely therapeutical and medical support of hearing-impaired persons | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Audifon GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Audifon GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named AUDIFON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |