Drawing for VASON

USPTO serial 79043689

VASON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VASON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cooking pots; utensils for household purposes, not of precious metal; kitchen containers, not of precious metal; non-electric pressure pans; non-precious metal tableware (not including cutlery, forks and spoons); kitchen utensils, not of precious metal; household utensils made of china and plastic (including basins, plates, jugs and cups); ceramics for household purposes; heat-insulated containers; glassware not included in other classes (including cups, plates, jugs, urns)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 11, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 12, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 20, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 20, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 27, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 12, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 12, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 20, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 20, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 18, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 18, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 11, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance