Drawing for NEOLINK

USPTO serial 79044954

NEOLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3547044Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 16, 2008
Examiner
SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NEOLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Miriam D. Trudell

Miriam D. Trudell Sheridan Ross P.C.1560 Broadway, Suite 1200Denver, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010DENTAL [ AND VETERINARY ] APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, ARTIFICIAL TEETH; DENTAL IMPLANTS; [ DENTAL IMPLANT APPARATUS, NAMELY, DRILL UNITS AND DRILL BITS; ] DENTAL BRIDGES; DENTAL CROWNS; DENTAL PROSTHESES [ ; DENTAL TOOLS, NAMELY, OSTEOTOMES ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 28, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 28, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 17, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 17, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 17, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 14, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 2, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 20, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 2, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 16, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 30, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 18, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 10, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 21, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance