USPTO serial 79045063
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis S. Ederer
Louis S. Ederer Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.114 West 47 Street, 21 FloorNew York, NY 10036-1525United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, distilled spirits and liqueurs | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |