USPTO serial 79045175
FURLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3608966Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 21, 2009
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with FURLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank P. Presta
Frank P. Presta Nixon & Vanderhye, P.C.901 N. Glebe Rd.11th FloorArlington, VA 22203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mechanical, electric and hydraulic winches; furling and reefing devices for sailboat rig systems, namely, hydraulic and electric pumps, machine motors, machine couplings and connected valves and hydraulic operated controls | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, electrical control devices for furling and reefing systems of sails, and remote controls, receiver cards and push buttons for such applications ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| May 12, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 8, 2018 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |