USPTO serial 79045259
GRANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clark W. Lackert
Clark W. Lackert King & Spalding LLP1185 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cheese | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |