USPTO serial 79045643
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1397 Carroll DriveAtlanta, GA 30318UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | COMMON METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS; METAL HYDRAULIC AND REFRIGERATION FITTINGS, NAMELY, METAL PIPES, FLEXIBLE METAL PIPES, METAL TUBE SOCKETS, METAL PIPE FITTINGS, PIPE UNIONS MADE OF METAL, METAL PIPE COUPLINGS AND JOINTS, TUBES OF METAL, METAL FLANGES, METAL ADAPTOR FITTINGS, RING SHAPED FITTINGS OF METAL, METAL CATCHES FOR METAL PIPES, METAL SAFES, METAL ORES, NAMELY, COPPER ORES, IRON ORES, LEAD ORES, NICKEL ORES, TIN ORES AND ZINC ORES; METAL CABLE WIRE | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 18, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 10, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |