Drawing for Q.SAFE

USPTO serial 79045643

Q.SAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3572766Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 10, 2009
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with Q.SAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1397 Carroll DriveAtlanta, GA 30318UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006COMMON METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS; METAL HYDRAULIC AND REFRIGERATION FITTINGS, NAMELY, METAL PIPES, FLEXIBLE METAL PIPES, METAL TUBE SOCKETS, METAL PIPE FITTINGS, PIPE UNIONS MADE OF METAL, METAL PIPE COUPLINGS AND JOINTS, TUBES OF METAL, METAL FLANGES, METAL ADAPTOR FITTINGS, RING SHAPED FITTINGS OF METAL, METAL CATCHES FOR METAL PIPES, METAL SAFES, METAL ORES, NAMELY, COPPER ORES, IRON ORES, LEAD ORES, NICKEL ORES, TIN ORES AND ZINC ORES; METAL CABLE WIREACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 30, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jan 30, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 24, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 26, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 8, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 1, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 2, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Feb 2, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Feb 2, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 13, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 1, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 18, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 15, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 10, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 17, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 17, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 29, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance