USPTO serial 79045942
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sugar; rice; flours; bread; pasta | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products and grains not included in other classes, namely processed grains, agricultural seeds; live animals; fresh fruits and vegetables; natural seeds, plants and flowers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Mineral and aerated water and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, energy drinks, flavored waters; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups, namely, flavored syrups for coffee and preparations for making beverages in the nature of fruit drinks, fruit juices, all of the foregoing sold in catering establishments and closed environments, namely, business and industry, hospital and healthcare institutions, education institutions, universities, schools, cultural and sporting institutions, museums, galleries, sports stadiums, travel locations, airports, rail, bus and petrol stations, and remote sites | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 16, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 16, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |