USPTO serial 79046479
PENGUEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3784862Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 4, 2010
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- —
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with PENGUEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PENGUEN GIDA SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
Bursa, TR
Other trademarks owned by PENGUEN GIDA SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
PENGUEN GIDA SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by PENGUEN GIDA SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
PENGUEN GIDA SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by PENGUEN GIDA SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
PENGUEN GIDA; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by PENGUEN GIDA; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
John S. Egbert Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned, dried, preserved or processed fruits and vegetables namely, peaches, apricots; [ frozen meals consisting of vegetables; ] tomato paste; preserved or processed beans, chick peas, lentil, and soy beans; [ processed olives, ] pickles | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | [ Coffee, artificial coffee, vegetal preparations for use as coffee substitutes, namely, chicory and chicory mixtures; coffee-based beverages; macaroni, ravioli, flour for food, flour-based products, namely, chips, pasta, dough products, namely, pizza dough, bread dough, biscuits, waffles, crackers, bread, pizzas, sandwiches; honey, royal jelly for human consumption, propolis for human consumption; salt; rice; tea; ketchup, mayonnaise, mustards, flavorings of lemons, ] sauces, salad dressings [, spices, namely, pepper, ginger, cinnamon powder, snacks made of cereals, namely, corn flakes, oatmeal ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | [ Agricultural products, namely, unprocessed grains, wheat, barley, oats, corn, maize, rye; horticultural products, namely, fresh fruits and vegetables; fresh mushrooms, raw mushrooms; forestry products, namely, unprocessed wood; crop seeds, grass seeds, plant seeds, rye seeds, flower seeds, fruit seeds, vegetable seeds; live animals, namely, poultry, chickens, quail, sheep, cattle, goats, cows; eggs for hatching, fertilized eggs for hatching; live plants, namely, flowers, sod, grass, seedlings, saplings; dried plants, namely, dried flowers, dried flower arrangements, dried flower wreaths, dried herbs for decorative wreaths and sachets, hay; animal feed, non-medicated additives for animal feed for use as nutritional supplements; malt extracts for consumption by animals, namely, food for animals; sanded paper for pets for animal litter, aromatic sand for pets for animal litter, pet food, bird seed, cuttlebones for birds ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PENGUEN GIDA SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by PENGUEN GIDA SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by PENGUEN GIDA SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by PENGUEN GIDA; SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named PENGUEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 24, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 13, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |