USPTO serial 79047517
TOARCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3587289Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 10, 2009
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOARCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK A. STEINER
MARK A. STEINER TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CENTER8TH FLOORSAN RANCISCO, CA 94111-3834Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Confectionary, namely, chocolates, chocolate covered coffee beans, candies, frozen confections, and coffee jelly confections in the nature of coffee-flavored gelatin desserts | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2023 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |