USPTO serial 79048426
CELLACTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELLACTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
13437 Berlin, DE
10783 Berlin, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cash registers, calculating machines, data processing apparatus and computers, integrated circuit chips, radio frequency identification chips; computer software for use in database management for use in mobile payment sector and to manage customer relationships of users on the internet and CD-ROM, cellphones, handheld computers, smart phones; laptop computers, desktop computers, notebook computers; software will be stored on CD-ROM, celiphones, handheld computers, smartphones; laptop computers, desktop computers, notebook computers; printers for use with computers; interface programs for computers; computer monitors for mobile devices, cellphones, handheld computers, and smart phones | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Financial affairs, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options using a mobile device at a point of sale; monetary affairs, namely, banking, electronic Funds transfer | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, transmission and reception of data concerning access payment services, gateway payment services, electronic payment services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design of computer hard and software; creation and maintenance of computer software; installation of computer software; Computer project management services in the domain of electronic data processing; consulting services concerning development of hard and software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Licensing of computer software; licensing of industrial property | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hischam Telib
- Other trademarks owned by Trium GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CELLACTIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 25, 2009 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2009 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |