USPTO serial 79048523
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann K. Ford
Ann K. Ford DLA Piper LLP (US)500 Eighth Street, NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk, milk powder, flavored gelled milk; milk products, namely, milk desserts, namely, dairy-based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; yoghurts; drinking yoghurts; mousses, namely, milk-based mousses and cheese-based mousses; creams; cream puddings made with milk; fresh cream; butter; cheese spreads; cheeses; ripened cheeses; mould-ripened cheeses; fresh unripened cheeses and pickled cheeses; cottage cheese; plain fresh cheese in paste, plain fresh cheese in liquid form, aromatized fresh cheese in paste and aromatized fresh cheese in liquid form;milk and dairy based-beverages; milk beverages with high milk content; milk beverages containing fruits; plain fermented milk, flavoured fermented milk | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee; tea; cocoa; chocolate; beverages made with coffee; beverages made with cocoa; beverages made with chocolate; sugar; rice; puffed rice; tapioca; flours; sweet tarts, savoury tarts, sweet pies, savory pies; pizzas; plain pasta, flavoured pasta, filled pasta; cereal preparations, namely, cereal-based snack foods, ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; breakfast cereals; prepared dishes mainly containing pasta; prepared dishes essentially consisting of pastry; plain bread, topped bread, filled bread, flavored bread; plain rusks, topped rusks, filled rusks, flavored rusks; plain sweet biscuit, plain savoury biscuit, topped sweet biscuit, topped savoury biscuit, filled sweet biscuit, filled savoury biscuit, flavoured sweet biscuit, flavoured savoury biscuit, plain wafers, topped wafers, filled wafers, flavored wafers, plain waffles, topped waffles, filled waffles, flavored waffles, plain cakes, topped cakes, filled cakes, flavored cakes; plain pastries, topped pastries, filled pastries, flavored pastries; confectionery in the nature of candy, chocolate, confectionery chips for baking, crystal sugar pieces, fruit jellies; edible ices; ice creams essentially made with yoghurt; ice-creams; sorbet; frozen yoghurts; flavoured frozen water; honey; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces; sweet sauces; pasta sauces; spices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Mineral still water, mineral sparkling water, non-mineral still water, non mineral sparkling water; fruit juices, vegetable juices;fruit drinks, vegetable drinks; lemonades; soda water; sorbet drinks; preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks; syrups for drinks; alcohol-free fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages and alcohol-free vegetable extracts used in the preparation of beverages; alcohol-free drinks comprising lactic fermenting agents, namely, lactic acid bacteria drink | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |