Drawing for TEMPERLITE

USPTO serial 79048895

TEMPERLITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3554401Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 30, 2008
Examiner
SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with TEMPERLITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200,San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Finished glass windows for vehiclesACTIVE
021Plate glass for cars; polished plate glass except building glass; unfinished glass for vehicle windows; ground plate glass except building glass; window glass for vehiclesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 7, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jan 7, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Dec 11, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 30, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 24, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 15, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 20, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jan 20, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jan 20, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 19, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 9, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 31, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 14, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 9, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 23, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 25, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 25, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 24, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 14, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Feb 14, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance