USPTO serial 79049025
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian B. Darville
Brian B. Darville Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.1940 DUKE STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Assistance in the industrial management of businesses for others, namely, industrial or commercial companies possessing an aircraft fleet; advisory services in connection with commercial aircraft company management using a methodology to be used in the business management of an aircraft engine park; consultancy services with regard to business management for owners and operators of aircraft engines; business consultancy services with regard to repairing, overhauling, servicing, and maintaining aircraft engines; business consulting services with regard to the definition and selection of tools and equipment in the field of repairing, overhauling, servicing, and maintaining aircraft engines; market research studies in the aeronautical field; compilation and providing statistical information relating to business management of aircraft engine parks | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair and reconditioning of aeronautical engines and parts of aeronautical engines; repair of apparatus, instruments, systems, equipment and electronic and electrical devices used on aircraft engines; repair, overhaul and maintenance services for engines used on aircraft and their component parts; under wing repair, overhaul and maintenance services for all types of engines used on aircraft and their component parts; reconditioning, namely, refurbishment and routine replacements for engines used on aircraft and for their component parts; providing online information, namely, consulting for repairing, overhauling, servicing, upgrading, and maintenance with respect to repair services in the aircraft sector, namely, 24-hour, seven day per week online assistance for the repair of aircraft engines and their components parts | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering services in the field of design of aircraft engines regarding evaluations, estimates and research of engineering plans; engineering consulting services regarding design and development methodologies to be used in the commercial management and replacement of engines used on aircraft and in the space sector; consulting in the field of engineering in connection with the engineering methodology to be used in repairing, overhauling, upgrading and maintaining aircraft engines | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 19, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 10, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |