Drawing for LUBRIMED

USPTO serial 79049357

LUBRIMED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3576396Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 17, 2009
Examiner
PILARO, MARK F
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with LUBRIMED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CECELIA M. PERRY

Cecelia M. Perry MCGLEW AND TUTTLE, P.C.SCARBOROUGH STATIONSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-9227UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Lubricating greases for medical instruments [ ; lubricating oils for medical instruments ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 28, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Oct 28, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 8, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 8, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Feb 8, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Feb 6, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 16, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 26, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 8, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 18, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 19, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Aug 19, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Aug 13, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 23, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 10, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 29, 2009LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jun 11, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
May 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 27, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 2, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 27, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Oct 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 14, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 23, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 23, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 23, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 28, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Feb 28, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance