USPTO serial 79049807
AMPET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3534351Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2008
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMPET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald N. Huff
Donald N. Huff Dykema Gossett PLLC1300 I Street, NW3rd Floor WestWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by R. Færch Plast A/S
- Other trademarks owned by R. Færch Plast A/S
- Other trademarks owned by R. Færch Plast A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named AMPET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |