USPTO serial 79050455
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yoshiko Osawa
Yoshiko Osawa Omori & Yaguchi USA, LLC1628 John F. Kennedy Boulevard, #1100Philadelphia,, PA 19103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | [ Goods of leather and imitations of leather, namely, ] sports bags[, umbrellas, parasols, trunks ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Sports clothing, namely, sport shirts, [ sport coats, sports bras, sports jerseys, and ]sport pants and [ shorts; footwear; headgear, namely, ]hats[ and caps] | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Sports articles, namely, skis, ski bindings, ski sticks[, snowboards, ski wax ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 12, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 13, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | PBSR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |